Skip to content

Conversation

@Jamesbarford
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford commented Dec 2, 2025

Regression test for recognising the ttbr0_el2 register.

closes #97724

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 2, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 2, 2025

r? @WaffleLapkin

rustbot has assigned @WaffleLapkin.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford changed the title Regression tests for system register ttbr0_el2 Regression test for system register ttbr0_el2 Dec 2, 2025
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

r=me with green CI

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 2, 2025

📌 Commit 7922479 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 2, 2025
@Jamesbarford
Copy link
Contributor Author

r=WaffleLapkin with green CI 🟢

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
… r=WaffleLapkin

Regression test for system register `ttbr0_el2`

Regression test for recognising the `ttbr0_el2` register.

closes #97724
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 7922479 with merge c5ca0f2...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-tools failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 3, 2025
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

WaffleLapkin commented Dec 3, 2025

@rustbot author

(also fyi "r=me" means "you can approve the pr on my behalf with @/bors r={myusername}"; I noticed you are a member of the org and thought you had the permissions to do so, my apologies)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 3, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 3, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@Jamesbarford
Copy link
Contributor Author

The failed item was;

Command `/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-tools-bin/rustbook test /checkout/src/doc/reference` failed with exit code 101

// More output

ERROR: Tool `reference` has regressed from test-pass to test-fail during beta week.

reference

Which, unless I'm mistaken, is not caused by these changes?

@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

Ah, fair enough.
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2025

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • This pull request previously failed. You should add more commits to fix the bug, or use retry to trigger a build again.
  • There's another pull request that is currently being tested, blocking this pull request: Update cargo submodule #149555

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2025

📌 Commit 7922479 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 3, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
…-ttbr0_el2, r=WaffleLapkin

Regression test for system register `ttbr0_el2`

Regression test for recognising the `ttbr0_el2` register.

closes rust-lang#97724
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #147841 (Fix ICE when applying test macro to crate root)
 - #149501 (CTFE: avoid emitting a hard error on generic normalization failures)
 - #149517 (Implement blessing for tidy alphabetical check)
 - #149521 (Improve `io::Error::downcast`)
 - #149545 (fix the check for which expressions read never type)
 - #149549 (Regression test for system register `ttbr0_el2`)
 - #149579 (Motor OS: fix compile error)
 - #149595 (Tidying up `tests/ui/issues` tests [2/N])
 - #149597 (Revert "implement and test `Iterator::{exactly_one, collect_array}`")

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rustc does not recognize ttbr0_el2 as a valid armv8 system register

5 participants